Metallica's Hetfield Earns Haters in Hikers
- Posted on Aug 19th 2008 5:00PM by Benjy Eisen
- Comments (2)
One of the most expensive places to live in the Bay Area (and just across the Golden Gate Bridge from San Francisco), Marin County has always been a refuge for rock stars who have made it big, have lots of dough and wish to escape the city. At the same time, the county still carries many of the hippie ideals first imported to it from San Francisco's Summer of Love era. Enter Sandman, err, James Hetfield. The Metallica frontman has long owned a 500-acre property in the area and, since then, also acquired an adjacent ranch. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, Hetfield made plans to build a 14,000-square-foot house, a 6,000-square foot studio and additional installations. While building hasn't commenced, the property does overlap with a public trail popular with hikers, bicyclers and equestrians.
Hetfield -- whose albums with Metallica include titles such as 'Kill 'Em All' and 'St. Anger' -- recently erected a tall and impenetrable metal fence (complete with barbed wire), preventing use of the otherwise public trail. Recreational traversers are angry, to say the least. While city officials recognize his rights as property owner, they're hoping to work out a deal with him that would allow access to the trail while still keeping the rest of his property closed off. To bite another Metallica title, doing so could conceivably, um, create justice for all.











Reader Comments(1 of 1)
hndsmepete23at 8-19-2008
It's not a public trail if it resides on someone's property. A public trail is in a state park or in other publicly owned areas. Those hikers should stop complaining because they are the one's in the wrong by trespassing on someone else's property.
Lindaat 8-31-2008
Actually it could be a public path. Most sidewalks on roads are public property; but Mr. Whiney could have built the fence where it blocked access to it; and yes sometimes, that is legal as well.