Cat Stevens Returns, as Yusuf Islam, to the U.S. Stage After Three Decades
- Posted on May 13th 2009 11:00AM by Steve Baltin
- Comments (7)
"I bet you never thought we'd make it," said Yusuf Islam, the singer-songwriter formerly known as Cat Stevens, after his first song on an American stage in 33 years. Truer words were never spoken. After having first left behind his pop-star past for several years, then famously being refused entry into the country in 2004 and suffering visa problems for a planned New York show earlier this month, the thought of ever seeing Cat Stevens sing 'Peace Train' live seemed an impossible dream.Even walking into Monday's invite-only show at Los Angeles' El Rey theater and seeing the name Cat Stevens, in quotes, on the marquee, was like stepping into a time warp. Islam took the stage a little after 8 pm, following an instrumental intro by his band, who welcomed him by saying, "First Cat, now Yusuf," beautifully bridging the three decades.
Islam opened with the simple, sweet 'Welcome Home,' the opening track on his new 'Roadsinger (to Warm You Through the Night)' collection, then followed with 'Lilywhite,' off 'Mona Bone Jakon,' an album he said, "Somehow I seem to connect much more with now."
Throughout the hourlong set he moved between his past catalog -- invoking chills during a sublime 'Where Do the Children Play' and moving the audience noticeably during 'Father and Son' -- and new material, such as 'Thinking 'Bout You' along with 'The Rain,' a song he said he pulled from a 1968 batch of songs.
Charming, genteel and humble, Islam has lost none of his onstage charisma, turning a gorgeous rendition of 'The Wind' into a storytelling session on the many breaks in his life, including the famous story of finding the Koran after nearly drowning. He introduced 'Wild World' by saying, "I bet you never thought 'Wild World' would be sung in Zulu," and delivered new songs like 'All Kinds of Roses' and 'Be What You Must' with engaging banter. The latter was written for a musical, of which he said, "God willing, will be out next year."
After yet another standing ovation for 'Father and Son,' the smiling Islam said, "You must let me go," before closing out the night with a singalong version of 'Peace Train' that captured all the hope and joy of one of those rare shows that surpassed all the expectation and hype.
- Filed under: Concerts and Tours, News
- Share & Bookmark :











Reader Comments(1 of 1)
papercranes10000at 5-16-2009
Yusef is an evil man. He called for the murder of Salman Rushdie. His bloodthirst led to the murder of his Japanese translator, attacks on several other translators, and the deaths of 37 people in Turkey. This violent man, Cat Stevens whatever, is a small brained beast who chirps mindless ditties like Peace Train while calling for the murder of others. He is far worse than Charles Manson. He should never be allowed in the US. We should never forget the evil that this man represents.
tudzaat 5-17-2009
Indeed, my first look showed that Yusuf denied support for the fatwa against Rushdie, but a quick look on YouTube under "Cat Stevens BBS 1989" turns up the video of the original show. It is very clear he is series that he would turn Rushdie in and hopes that he dies.
tudzaat 5-17-2009
Sorry if I double post here.
All you need to do is search YouTube for Cat Stevens BBC 1989 and you will find Yusuf saying very clearly that he wants Rushdie dead and he would help make it happen.
eminskerat 5-19-2009
Uhhh...Cat Stevens isn't a terrorist. Come on.
tudzaat 6-30-2009
Don't think anyone here said he was a terrorist. He's a guy who sings songs about peace yet condones the order to murder an author for what he wrote. Make of that what you will.
Anvar Samadzodaat 8-03-2009
This is what Yusuf says about the issue:
http://www.yusufislam.com/faq/3ed8ab9cb40dcd15dc38b7f0efc2f696/
Melissaat 9-07-2009
Oh, for heaven's sake - I wish people would actually read what is printed instead of simply interpret it in a way that serves their purpose. The man was NOT calling for anyone to be killed, not at all; he was simply reiterating what the literal interpretation of the Ku'ran states for what is considered blasphemous to their writings. He clearly states that whether he agrees with it personally or not, it's what is stated in the book. That is ALL he was saying - simply interpreting it. He wasn't supporting or suggesting or anything - for people to take and twist things around - why, gee - sounds just like what many Christians do to their teachings in their Bible, to try to fit what works for them. That must be why the methodolgy seems so familiar.
Stop reading things into what others' do simply to serve your own purposes - that's much of what's wrong with our country (the United States), nowadays - inflammatory statements - and let him be who he has been for years - a peaceful, talented man who has given so many of us joy through his music for many years.