Dandy Warhols Cover 'Blackbird' After Michael Jackson's Death
- Posted on Aug 3rd 2009 3:45PM by Dan Reilly
- Comments (259)
When Dandy Warhols frontman Courtney Taylor-Taylor sang "When Michael Jackson dies/ We're covering Blackbird" on the title track of 2003's 'Welcome to the Monkey House,' he didn't expect to fulfill the promise six years later. Alas, the Portland band just released their version of the Beatles hit just over a month after Jackson's unexpected death at the age of 50. As Taylor-Taylor tells Spinner, "The story is exponentially longer than the song.""I wrote a very short little song making vague references to how gross the business side of making music is," Taylor-Taylor -- who was upset with the band's label over their critique of 'Monkey House' -- continues. The song includes lines about Elastica being sued by Wire for plagiarism, as well as the line aimed at Jackson. "It was because he had outbid Paul McCartney on Paul McCartney's songs," Taylor-Taylor says. "That's the rudest thing you can possibly do. I guess the difference is Paul McCartney is one of the greatest songwriters in history and Michael Jackson is one of the greatest singer/dancers in history, so it's the difference between an entertainer and a writer. Rumor has it that Jackson just said to McCartney, 'I'm a businessman,' so I guess he was, and thus when Michael Jackson is no longer alive to receive publishing money from the Beatles, we'll cover a Beatles song."
For Taylor-Taylor, the choice of 'Blackbird' wasn't because the song is a personal favorite. "It's a bummer because it's a hard song to cover," he says. "'Blackbird' was the only Beatles song that fit into the rhyme scheme of 'absurd' and 'heard.' I don't even know if it was one of the songs Jackson bought. I should have done 'I Want to Hold Your Hand' or something."
Of course, as soon as Jackson died, Taylor-Taylor was repeatedly reminded of the promise. "I was in England and woke up one morning to 18 texts that said 'I guess you're going to cover 'Blackbird' and 'Dude, cover time,'" he says. Warhols guitarist Peter Holmstrom started an arrangement right away and the rest of the band added their parts later on. "It's a little trippier, a little dreamier," Taylor-Taylor says of their version. "We slowed it down and I sang it very high, and then we sped it back up. It actually sounds like Michael Jackson singing it. It's sweet and lullaby-ish but there's something creepy without it being Gothic, which is great."
Despite the anti-Jackson sentiment on 'Monkey House,' Taylor-Taylor holds the late singer in high regard. "Michael Jackson is one of the 10 biggest names in the 20th century," he says. "He's up there with Elvis, Adolf. He's bigger than Mick Jagger." Taylor-Taylor also doesn't see any problem with the incessant media coverage of MJ's death. "He was so important to music and culture and had become an iconic freak," he says. "It wasn't like the media coverage when that Guess jeans supermodel that then became a big jelly donut died. Anna Nicole Smith. They treated her like a true legend, a truly important entertainer died. So, I wasn't horrified by the coverage."
'Blackbird' and 'The Dandy Warhols Are Sound,' the band's newly released original mix of 2003's 'Welcome to the Monkey House,' are available on the band's official website.





Reader Comments(1 of 13)
Marcelaat 8-05-2009
For your information - Paul McCartney had a chance to buy publishing rights for his own songs twice before Michael bought it. And then it only cost $20 mil. And Paul McCartney could have had easily outbid Michael. I don't understand why McCartney gets upset. He is probably mad at himself.
Walrusat 8-05-2009
Marcela
at 8-05-2009For your information - Paul McCartney had a chance to buy publishing rights for his own songs twice before Michael bought it. And then it only cost $20 mil. And Paul McCartney could have had easily outbid Michael. I don't understand why McCartney gets upset. He is probably mad at himself.
***********
The reason McCartney didn't buy the rights to his songs was because he wanted both he and Yoko to be co-owners, because he felt it was only right they both should share in the ownership. Yoko felt they could hold out for a better price, and while they were waiting, Michael swept in like a vulture and purchased the rights. Paul should be angry that he was the one on the set of the video of Say, Say, Say advised Michael to go into music publishing, since there was money to be made. MIchael even told him at that point that "One day I will own your songs". Michael said one of his goals was to be the richest musicians ever. Yeah a very noble and selfish goal. At least he died before achieving that "noble" goal. To the person who said Michael is in heaven, I want to ask how do you know? HAve you spoken with him since he died? :) No one knows where he is, except buried 6 feet in the ground. Sure he was a great dancer, and a decent singer and an average songwriter, but he wasn't God, like the media has been making him out to be since his death. He was just a troubled man, who was messed up in the head, with much thanks to his father.
Marcelaat 8-06-2009
Marcela
at 8-05-2009For your information - Paul McCartney had a chance to buy publishing rights for his own songs twice before Michael bought it. And then it only cost $20 mil. And Paul McCartney could have had easily outbid Michael. I don't understand why McCartney gets upset. He is probably mad at himself.
***********
The reason McCartney didn't buy the rights to his songs was because he wanted both he and Yoko to be co-owners, because he felt it was only right they both should share in the ownership. Yoko felt they could hold out for a better price, and while they were waiting, Michael swept in like a vulture and purchased the rights. Paul should be angry that he was the one on the set of the video of Say, Say, Say advised Michael to go into music publishing, since there was money to be made. MIchael even told him at that point that "One day I will own your songs". Michael said one of his goals was to be the richest musicians ever. Yeah a very noble and selfish goal. At least he died before achieving that "noble" goal. To the person who said Michael is in heaven, I want to ask how do you know? HAve you spoken with him since he died? :) No one knows where he is, except buried 6 feet in the ground. Sure he was a great dancer, and a decent singer and an average songwriter, but he wasn't God, like the media has been making him out to be since his death. He was just a troubled man, who was messed up in the head, with much thanks to his father.
To Walrus
Exactly. He waited years for better price???? Are you kidding me? I know he asked Yoko Ono but the catalogue was for sale twice before Michael bought it and McCartney wasn't bidding on it. Because the price went up, it didn't go down...What was McCartney thinking? And Michael did not tell him that he's gonna own his songs and be the richest musician. He was too much of a gentlemen to do this. And for your information, Michael is not buried yet and I don't believe in God. I don't know where you got the info about me thinking Michael's in Heaven. And don't worry. McCartney still own rights to the songs but not the publishing ones. He is still getting fat royalties. But I told you. He was too cheap. He should have jumped all over the catalogue. He could have always dealt with Yoko if she wanted to buy half later.
Romeoat 8-04-2009
LOL! What an ass! Michael Jackson is like atleast 10 times bigger than Elvis Presley on a worldwide scale! Leave the places you guys live in and see the world. You will know what I'm talking about!
smokin`n`akat 8-04-2009
LOL People think Micheal Jackson is bigger and better then Elvis?! Elvis is a legend1 He never touched any lil boy or why would Elvis have these types of people screaming over them back in the day? Makes no sence you people are just to short minded, how bout you expand your music history then get back to us!
frrrfdddat 8-04-2009
are u nuts Elvis was king michal was a freak he gave himself the name king of pop others gave Elvis the name king of rock michal wanted to be Elvis so bad he stole his name and maried his kid but the problem is the he like little boys and should of been in jail so dont even try to say that little puke was as big as Elvis
vikasat 8-05-2009
yeah i agree with you. michael jackson is popular on every square kilometer on earth. he is the truest and biggest definition of a global superstar. even presley fans say 60% of presley's sales comes from the us, 33% from uk, thus leaving 7% elsewhere - that does not constitute a global star. they need to realize that most people in the world live outside the us and even uk. and the aloha special was broadcast over the world to lots of people - just like the superbowl - but no one knew or cared to actually sit and watch outside our country and maybe again the uk.
Lanneyat 8-04-2009
You must be pretty out of it to think Michael Jackson was better than Elvis. If it wasn't for Elvis, there would be no Michael Jackson. He started the Rock and Roll ball rolling. Michael was the King of Pop, and I liked him a lot. He wanted to be like Elvis, by trying to get his song library and marrying his daughter, but he still is not Elvis.
amigoat 8-04-2009
It's an "era" DOPEY.
elvis sucksat 8-04-2009
MICHAEL JACKSON IS WAYYYYYYYYYY BIGGER THAN ELVIS ON A GLOBAL SCALE ELVIS ONLY INFLUENCED WHITE PEOPLE.
Fanof theTRUEKingat 8-04-2009
Elvis was THE originator !!! Michal Jackson was, at best, a copier of many styles. He just had better agents and promoters than the other idiots of the day.
Rock & Roll was, is and always will be better then pop. Pop is just surface crap aimed at pre-teens that have no business expressing an opinion of any kind of music. Pop is like rap & disco.....nothing to it but meaningless fluff, no musical value at att. Rock & Roll and Rock are the true artistic and deep forms of music. The word "music" should never even be permitted to be attached behind the words "pop", "rap" or "disco". (Note I did not capatlize those words, they don't deserve it.)
To say michael jack-off was bigger than Elvis is, at best, LAUGHABLE. He is onlt bigger in the tiny, feeble minds of his loser followers. He was NEVER an originator like Elvis. He proclaimed himself "the king of pop", Elvis was given the title of "The KING of Rock & Roll" by the music industry itself, he never said he was.
Deeat 8-04-2009
hey Romeo....that's because we have the internet worldwide, 24 tv and news. You are not even comparing apples to apples. Elvis in his time WAS and IS still big!! And yet both died from addictions. Because of sad and unhappy lives!! They are both much loved and admired.
INTO228at 8-04-2009
Fanof theTRUEKing- ORIGINATED WHAT? LOL BLACK PEOPLE INVENTED ROCK AND ROLL ARE YOU SMOKING?
MAMAat 8-04-2009
You are absolutely right. Michael Jackson was larger than life. When you travel outside the United States, you will understand. He will grately be missed.
samcw2000at 8-04-2009
You are calling Michael Jackson an imitator? Don't you realize that everything Elvis did was him copying what black people did in their music and dance? You people kill me. Elvis took what he saw black doing and singing a played it on stage so all the white americans could watch, nothing more. He even gave a credit (in backhanded manner) to people like Little Richard.
Stillmanat 8-04-2009
Elvis put R&B and C&W together to make rock music, sang at least a dozen great songs, and only outlived his productive career by a few years. The little creep can't match ten percent of that.
elvis???at 8-04-2009
how many songs did elvis actually write? none.
did elvis start rock n roll? no.
get the facts straight b/c elvis was actually the biggest copy cat there was.
Romeat 8-04-2009
Elvis Presley was Michael Jacksons Idol.....
Elvis is still in the news after being dead 33 yrs
wow....tells ya something, doesn't it?
The king of Rock n roll lives forever
the self proclaimed king of pop gum music, is no where near what Elvis was, and michael would have told you the same thing, he adored Elvis....You need to read his biography in his own words, even told his ex wife lisa marie presley, Elvis's daughter that he felt his fate would be like her dads. and he was right. think before you shoot your mouth off, really, you dont even know about michael jackson, if you did, you'd know, Elvis
was what he called the entertainer of the century.
Tim Wilsonat 8-04-2009
BOTH of you are nuts! Jackson was a child molesting drug addict and Elvis bought his wife from her parents at the tender age of 12, so he was also a child molesting drug addict. A man's got to know his limitations!
Timat 8-04-2009
BOTH of you are nuts! Jackson was a child molesting drug addict, as was Elvis. He bought his wife from her parents at the tender age of 12 or 13...research it!
Obviously, neither one of them was the man they thought... A man's gotta know his limitations!