Annette Brown, Lifetime The story of June Carter Cash comes to life in the…
Michael Jackson's Children Accept Singer's Lifetime Achievement Award
- Posted on Jan 31st 2010 10:02PM by Mike Ayers

3-D came to the Grammys in tribute to Michael Jackson. Celine Dion, Jennifer Hudson, Usher, Carrie Underwood and Smokey Robinson collaborated on a version of 'The Earth Song,' from Jackson's 'HIStory: Past, Present and Future, Book I.' The performers each emerged from behind the stage, as viewers at home saw the images in 3-D, juxtaposed over images of horses, hummingbirds and children laying in grassy fields.
Jackson's vocals could be heard over the loud speaker, with the singers providing background vocals, occasionally making it hard to discern what was prerecorded and what was live. The performance has been one of the most anticipated of the night, as this is the first Grammy Awards since Jackson's death last summer.
After the performance, Jackson was presented the Lifetime Achievement award by Lionel Richie with Jackson's kids, Prince and Paris, onstage to accept the award. "We are proud to be here to accept this award on behalf of our father, Michael Jackson," said Prince. "Through all his songs, his message was simple: love."
Michael Jackson on AOL Music
- Filed under: Concerts and Tours, News, Awards
Add a Comment
YES,MICHAEL'S{BIOLOGICAL CHILDREN] WERE FABULOUS. I AM SO SO SO GLAD THAT THEY ACCEPTED THIS AWARD FOR THEIR FANTASTIC DADDY;I WISH BLANKET WOULD HAVE BEEN THERE TO BUT MAYBE HE WAS NOT READY YET!!MICHAEL'S CHILDREN ARE WONDERFUL AND I AM SOOOOO SORRY THAT HAVE TO BE PUT THROUGH THIS HORRIBLE ORDEAL BECAUSE OF A MURDERER LIKE MURRAY!!!
February 04 2010 at 7:41 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replyoops, I meant to say the Grammys, not Emmys! Sorry!
February 02 2010 at 2:07 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI agree that this "tribute" was disappointing & insincere, in view of the incredible man they were supposed to be honoring & considering the incredible hype it received ! I wanted to see the entire video, that was so powerful in "This is It'. The message for the video & song were lost as the video was shown in bits & pieces, & the words were hard to understand. The image of the little girl saving the flower as the bulldozers came closer, was left out. That was ridiculous. It would've been awesome to see a bulldozer "come out" on the stage in 3 D , as it did in the movie.
I didn't like the artists up on stage, who didn't support Michael when he was alive, singing his intelligent, meaningful lyrics, while blocking the video! Who chose them as the close friends or admirers of Michael? Carrie Underwood?? They must've been chosen for the different singing styles, & not for anything remotely connected to Michael. Their voices weren't close to the caliber of Michael's. I'd have preferred & expected to see the entire video in 3 D with just Michael's voice singing & of course, the great man himself dancing in the foreground. That would've been amazing to see in 3 D!!
Where were the audience members' glasses? Were they handed out & some audience members refused to wear them? If so, that was a complete insult to the man, artist, genius, who could out sing, out dance & out sell any of them. It would also be an insult to his children & mother who were there in attendance.
What were the Emmy producers thinking when they created this weak, short "tribute' to the greatest entertainer & best selling artist? With all the good that Michael did for the music business & contributions to "We are the World", he was spotlighted for such a pitiful, short amount of time. For a lifetime achievement award, more should have been said about his contributions & accomplishments, instead of the short intro by Lionel Richie & the meager video montage.
Beyonce was heralded for breaking an Emmy record, but did some people forget that Michael broke a record first? Why wasn't that mentioned in the tribute, that Thriller outsold all other albums or all of the numerous non musical awards he won during his short lifetime? ? What a shame! The only part that wasn't a shame was the appearance of Michael's children, looking & sounding incredibly poised, mature & showing grace in light of their incredible tragedy. I'm 53 yrs old, lost my dad 7 months ago & can't imagine speaking in front of an audience. Michael would be so proud of his kids. I sincerely hope that Michael's fans keep his image, message, songs & dancing alive, as well as support his children in any move they make to follow in their fathers' footsteps.
I also agree with Dugger's that it was a shame & that Michael could not perform in his own country for his loyal fans here, because of trumped charges that *were* acquitted, the harsh judgments & tabloid fodder about everything he did, from his hair, face, clothes, home & even his being a father . He had more class, compassion, gentleness & generosity than all of the artists put together! As Prince said, his dad was all about "love". I'm really sad about this pathetic attempt by the Emmy's. Truly, a disappointment.
RIP MICHAEL JACKSON!!!! GOD BLESS YOU!!!!
February 01 2010 at 3:37 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyYes it is not untypical of the US to only honour its dead stars. For a whole twelve years before he died, Michael could not dare play live shows in the US (except Hawaii) without the fear of being either shot by some mad church going redneck, or ridiculed and attacked because of the various accusations of child abuse. 'nuf said.
February 01 2010 at 12:18 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replyhi
yes i agree, he should of got the recognision he deserved while he was alive, i was privaliged to see him many times in concert and he was spectacular, i still have the ticket stubbs and will cherish them, he was a genius , and michael would of been so proud of his children , they are very elegant young adults and will grow up to be brilliant people . the world will never be the same without michael , but us true fans will kepp his memory alive, no doubt about it ,
i miss you michael, god bless xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
hi
how right this award should have been presented before the world lost a great man .
in someones hour of need we should have bee there for him ,he needed all of us to give him a boost to his life,
they are a credit to you micheal ,sadly we lost someone special to all of us .RIP.MJ.
maggie m.
Why do they always give these awards out to those who have died. The award should have been given to him while MJ was alive to see how much appreciated all his contributions to the music industry. Where were these people when MJ needed them the most during his troubled periods of his life.
February 01 2010 at 7:21 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replythe grammys should have done a better job at that tribute.. i waited 2months to see a great tribute to the KIng Of Pop, n that was a total wast of time Academy. they hyped me up with the promos about it and when i watched it was sading...it's sad the man that sold more records the that whole crowd together, got a simple send-off on music's biggest night... The bet awards did a better job with only two days of his passing.
February 01 2010 at 1:41 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI thought the tribute was excellent. How sweet that his children were there to accept the award. Looks like Prince Michael and Paris are becoming very well behaved young adults. No doubt to how they were raised with all the love Michael had. Miss you as always RIP Michael.
January 31 2010 at 11:15 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Reply











11 Comments