Metal Blade Records On May 17, As I Lay Dying vocalist Tim Lambesis appeared in…
David Bowie Musical a No-Go: Reps Say the Rock Legend Hasn't Licensed Songs
- Posted on Nov 27th 2011 4:30PM by Kenneth Partridge
Andrew H. Walker, Getty Images
Turns out Singh was right to be suspicious.
"Neither the David Bowie Organization, nor its co-publishers EMI Music and Chrysalis, has issued a license for a Bowie musical at the O2, as has been reported in the UK," read a statement issued earlier today (Nov. 27) by representatives for the British rock legend. "There are no negotiations pending for a long-running musical featuring the music of Mr. Bowie."
The show -- reportedly set in a dystopian future and based around some 20 Bowie classics, including 'Heroes,' 'The Jean Jeanie' and 'Let's Dance' -- was to have been directed by Matthew Gould, whose previous West End credits include 'Les Miserables' and 'Cats.'
While bands such as Madness, Abba and Queen have already been the subjects of jukebox musicals, Bowie has long resisted sanctioning a show of his own.
"His people had warned us that it was very unlikely that he would be interested and that he had been asked many times before," Singh told the Guardian.
"We did not want Mr Bowie to think it was going to be a tribute show, and that seems to have had an effect," he added.
If Bowie has, indeed, put the kibosh on the show, it's bad news not just for Singh and Gould, but also the three charities that stood to benefit from the production. According to the Guardian, proceeds were to have gone to the Orpheus Centre, Albert & Friends Instant Circus and Youth Music Theatre UK, all of which are arts groups for underprivileged youngsters.
Watch David Bowie's Video for 'Heroes'
Watch 'The Life and Career of David Bowie'
- Filed under: News
Around The Web:
David Bowie Fan Page - Teenage Wildlife
David Bowie | Free Music, Tour Dates, Photos, Videos
David Bowie – Free listening, videos, concerts, stats, & pictures at ...
Add a Comment
Why should bowie be guilted into signing off on his property just because Singh is giving a portion of the proceeds to a charity, and no doubt keeping a good hunk of the proceeds himself1 Bowie is not a jerk. He has given and continues to give to the charities of his choice, including War Child, which he co-founded. I too have been called selfish or a jerk for not giving to the charities someone else wanted me to give to. But I choose which charities I wish to give to, and I don't think anyone needs to know about it. Just because Bowie is not giving to the charity this Singh person wants him to give to, does not mean he does not give!!!
November 27 2011 at 9:28 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWhat a bush league move, make some charities beneficiaries so Bowie looks like the bad guy hurting the kids if he doesn't comply. He is a jerk in all probability, but a smart, rich jerk. They'll have to cough up points on the gross to get his approval.
November 27 2011 at 9:12 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Reply











2 Comments