Hartman Group As rock 'n' roll's preeminent purist, it makes perfect sense…
Bruce Springsteen: Rocker Charges US Government With 'Un-American' Acts
- Posted on Feb 17th 2012 4:00PM by Jason MacNeil
Taylor Hill, FilmMagic
"What was done to our country was wrong and unpatriotic and un-American and nobody has been held to account," Springsteen told The Guardian. "There's a real patriotism underneath the best of my music. But it is a critical, questioning and often angry patriotism."
Springsteen, who gave critics an advanced listen of the new studio album, also said the fury behind some of the record's lyrics, including the title track, was because "a big promise has been broken."
"You can't have a United States if you are telling some folks that they can't get on the train," he said. "There's a cracking point where a society collapses. You can't have a civilization where something is factionalized like this."The musician noted he plans to back President Barack Obama leading up to the November election but he may not offer his support as overtly as he did during the 2008 election.
"I don't write for one side of the street... But the Bush years were so horrific you could not just sit around," Springsteen said. "It was such a blatant disaster. I campaigned for Kerry and Obama, and I am glad I did. But normally I would prefer to stay on the sidelines. The artist is supposed to be the canary in the cage."
As for Obama's first term as President, Springsteen listed Obama's healthcare legislation ("thought not the public system I would have wanted"), the death of Osama Bin Laden and bringing "sanity to the top level of government" as successes. But he also said "big business still has too much of a say in government" and felt the Guantanamo Bay detention camp "would have been closed" by now.
Springsteen also cited the recent Occupy movements around the world, especially Occupy Wall Street, with pushing important issues to the forefront. "The Occupy Wall Street movement has been powerful about changing the national conversation," he said, as reported by The Telegraph. "The Tea Party set the conversation for a while but now people are talking about economic equality. That's a conversation America hasn't had for 20 years."
According to the rocker, the album's first single 'We Take Care of Our Own' -- which Springsteen performed last week at the Grammys -- gets right to the point. "The song asks the question that the rest of the record tries to answer which is, 'Do we?' We often don't," he said as reported by The Evening Standard. "I write carefully and precisely and I believe clearly. If you're missing it, you're not quite thinking hard enough."
The Telegraph reports Springsteen addressed the strong emotion driving the album, too. "You can never go wrong in rock 'n' roll when you're pissed off," he said. "My work has always been about judging the distance between American reality and the American dream."
Springsteen also said "a lovely moment for me" on the album is the sax on 'Land of Hope and Dreams,' a song that features the late Clarence Clemons. "Losing Clarence is like something elemental, it's like losing the rain, that's a part of life," he said.
Springsteen launches the 'Wrecking Ball' world tour in Atlanta on March 18. The European leg begins May 13 in Sevilla and runs through July 31 in Helsinki. Although nothing is confirmed, there's speculation a second North American leg is planned for later in 2012.
Download Bruce Springsteen Songs | Buy Bruce Springsteen Albums
- Filed under: News, New Releases
Around The Web:
Wrecking Ball: brucespringsteen.net: Bruce Springsteen
Bruce Springsteen's new album Wrecking Ball: track by track review ...
Wrecking Ball (Special Edition) by Bruce Springsteen - Preorder ...
Bruce Springsteen: 'What was done to my country was un-American'
Bruce Springsteen taps Clarence Clemons' nephew, Jake Clemons, as saxophonist
Add a Comment
for all springsteen's flag waving and posing, it always annoyed me that his main acoustic guitar for years was a black yamaha---anything wrong, bruce, with a martin or gibson or even a guild or taylor???
February 25 2012 at 3:50 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyBruce Springsteen says “What was done to our country was wrong and unpatriotic and un-American and nobody has been held to account"
Sadly it is even much worse than that, as the country has yet to understand what was done to it.
The introduction of regulatory risk-adverseness into the banking system of the home of the brave was definitely un-American.
Bad bank regulations could be used as a lethal weapon of terrorism. http://bit.ly/xdSQLn
http://igg.me/p/66754?a=412874
If you like Bruce's music and songwriting, please share this project with others.
Thanks,
Jim
Bruce made his money the old fashion way, "he has earned it" in a very capitalistic manner. He has been smart enough and surrounded him with handlers whom he has carefully filtered to ensure they give him great advice and helped him build, and protect, his brand into international fame and fortune. It's the American Way.
Is he perfect, no? Do I believe he could be doing more from a philanthropic position, yes. But, only because Bruce's life is so much more private than other entertainers that we really don't know what he does other than the donations he makes to food banks at every concert town, which he has done since at least 1984.
I've seen Bruce LIVE with an without The E Street Band 66 times since the fall of 1980 and am scheduled to see 8 shows thus far on the Wrecking Ball Tour, and I'm excited to hear the CD in full on March 6th.
From a personal perspective, my wife and are middle class, make a decent living putting us in the 99%. I have a small business that has struggled in recent years which I equate not to the economy but to my own business and marketing strategies which have taken longer to reap results than I anticipated. My wife has the steady job with the health benefits that give us somewhat of a safety net, for now, but feel the foundation very tenuous and continue to evaluate each decision carefully balancing the present happiness and comfort with our future.
Thanks for allowing me to express my opinions here and flushing out my feelings about Bruce, his politics, his approach and his new music. And, as always...
"...Show a little faith, there's magic in the Night!
I'm proud of Bruce for speaking his mind. Bruce (and every entertainer, actor, athlete, etc.) has as much right to speak about their opinions and attitudes about what's going on in their country of citizenship as any one of us.
Not only am I proud of him, I believe its almost his (and others with an audience with whom they have emotional capital) civic duty to use to influence those he can. It's no different than any of his fans who also have the right to work for a political campaign, have candidate parties and fund raisers at their homes, etc.
That is what makes America America. It's called the First Amendment! For those of you that tell entertainers to "just shut up and sing" you are asking another fellow American citizen to waive his/her First Amendment rights, which is also your First Amendment right and so I'm not going to tell you not to express that opinion.
Fans that want Bruce to "just shut up and sing" always have the option to "turn off the music and stop listening." Which, to me, is the logical solution.
Bruce, more than any other artist in his generation, is directly connected to previous musical political commentators such as Woody Guthrie, Pete Seeger and Bob Dylan, among others. If you've followed Bruce to this point at any level you already know this and you also know he strongly endorsed Kerry and Obama and strongly took offense to Ronald Reagan co-opting his "Born In the USA" song(s) during the 1984 campaign.
Bruce's music has always been tied closely to his lyrics. You can't separate the music and the message from the man and he wouldn't want it any other way. I find it comical and confusing that a man like Gov. Chris Christie in New Jersey is such a fan of Bruce's music, has he not been listening to the lyrics after The River?
I do agree with Bruce's political stance and see myself as a social liberal and economic moderate to conservative and would never tell an entertainer who is proponent of a conservative candidate to "just shut up and sing," especially if their music, lyrics and message were as integrated as Bruce is. It's who they are and they have the right to use their medium to take their message to their audience, who has the choice, in America, to listen and be influenced by it or not.
For those who believe Bruce should forfeit his fortune and just give it away to those who have fallen on hard times because he is no in the 1% are naive and being unfair. Bruce is making political commentary about what he sees as actions taken by certain segment of society that purposely manipulated the playing field and took advantage of circumstances they created for their own benefit.
Some people got caught up in it riding a wave they didn't understand, made very poor decisions and are blaming those who "duped" them, without them doing their due-dligence (many Madoff victims fall in this category). Investing is a risk. We all make decisions and have to live with the results of those decisions.
No offense, but please just shut up and sing.
February 17 2012 at 4:55 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyHey Bruce, speaking of income inequality, I've gone through a failed bankruptcy and a home foreclosure and currently make $32/hour, though I have no benefits or insurance and if I don't work I don't get paid. You're worth $200 million. Why wait for the government? How about distributing your own income - since you're part of the 1 percent - and help me out? I have all of your albums through Human Touch/Lucky Town and have paid to see you four times. Why don't you and your mega-rich celebrity buddies put your money where your mouth is, "Boss."
February 17 2012 at 4:23 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Reply











7 Comments