Phil Spector, HBO Movie: Producer's Wife Blasts TV Production, Says Her Husband 'Couldn't Hurt a Fly'

I read that book also and his ex-wife said he started real weird and kept her like a prisoner and she was very afraid of him. And I think he had did that to someone else too. His wife maybe didn't get a chance to see that side of him yet. But he is crazy from what the women he had been involved him.

Both the defense and the prosecution put on their very best case. The defense counsel for this case is legendary and they did their best but Spector was still found guilty and as the law states, "beyond a reasonable doubt." While I'm sure that like anything Hollywood produces the film took poetic license and placed Spector in the worst possible light personality wise, there's no doubt in my mind that he is guilty as charged and behind bars where he belongs.

Rachelle Spector said that the victims teeth flew outward and up to the top of the stairs, and there was no blood, or tissue or gunshot residue on her husband. The only way those teeth would have flown out and upward is if the gun barrel was ''inside the victims mouth and the barrel pointing up and out as it would have been if SHE pulled the trigger. If Spector had been anywhere in FRONT of the victim, there would have been evidence on his clothes and on his hands. There is more than one reason he would have said he ''killed her'' right after her death. If he has a conscience at all, he would have felt the guilt of having driven someone to kill themselves, for one thing. He would have felt ''responsible'' for her death, and I think that is what the jury felt when they convicted him. The scientific evidence for murder is not there.

You're easily persuaded.

Sorry to inform you, my father did have GSR on him but was not brought up in court because he was the owner of 14 guns. GSR was expected to be on him, whether he shot the gun or not. There was blood spatter and tissue found in his hair which places him in close proximity of the blast. The gun had a shortened barrel which would have placed the hand a lot closer to the mouth, blocking most of the blast and material from him except for a few minute particles that did land on the jacket. Those particles would not have been able to travel more than a few feet again, placing him a lot closer than Rachelle wants to admit. All of this info was proven during the trial.

Also, Rachelle was not even in the picture then, how would she know anything other than what she was told.She was hired to be Michelle Blains Assistant.

Also, one question to conceder, what good does it do to become a Detective after the case goes to trial and as a "Detective", what evidence has she ever brought forth? She admitted to having in her possession Lana Clarkson's diary but choose to keep it from the trial. What kind of a "Detective" does that make her. Besides, when I did a basic search, it turned out that her license was from another Country anyway, if the info I came across (from her site), was even accurate.

The investigators followed the evidence and did not deviate from that.

a jury did that for us,,,,,,,,,,,

Actually, from what I've heard from those close to him, the 7 years prior to Feb 3, 2003, he was sober and in a dating relationship (which promptly ended Feb 4th). For those years, he was a decent person and once even reached out to me as a father (May 1999). It was the last time I ever saw him face to face. I just wish it happened more often.